Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.bhp.com.au!mel.dit.csiro.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.cis.okstate.edu!news.ksu.ksu.edu!news.mid.net!newsfeeder.gi.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!inet-nntp-gw-1.us.oracle.com!news.caldera.com!news.cc.utah.edu!park.uvsc.edu!usenet
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: The better (more suitable)Unix?? FreeBSD or Linux
Date: 22 Feb 1996 22:38:58 GMT
Organization: Utah Valley State College, Orem, Utah
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <4gira2$a9d@park.uvsc.edu>
References: <4gejrb$ogj@floyd.sw.oz.au> <Dn67EK.3nB@pe1chl.ampr.org> <4gilab$97u@park.uvsc.edu> <4giqu8$aqk@park.uvsc.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hecate.artisoft.com
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:14862 comp.os.linux.development.system:18653
mday@park.uvsc.edu (Matt Day) wrote:
[ ... ]
] Synchronous metadata updates suck.
Absolutely *nothing* sucks worse than losing data.
Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't.
] I'll be glad if/when the soft updates solution is in.
Me too.
Terry Lambert
terry@cs.weber.edu
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.