Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.os.linux.development.system Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!newsroom.utas.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.ysu.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!news1!not-for-mail From: root@dyson.iquest.net (John S. Dyson) Subject: Re: The better (more suitable)Unix?? FreeBSD or Linux X-Nntp-Posting-Host: dyson.iquest.net Message-ID: <4g5bij$9o@dyson.iquest.net> Sender: news@iquest.net (News Admin) Organization: John S. Dyson's home machine References: <4er9hp$5ng@orb.direct.ca> <4g2213$e3f@cebaf4.cebaf.gov> <4g34o7$esr@park.uvsc.edu> <4g55o2$hua@cebaf4.cebaf.gov> Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 19:50:43 GMT Lines: 19 Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:14508 comp.os.linux.development.system:18219 In article <4g55o2$hua@cebaf4.cebaf.gov>, Larry Doolittle <doolitt@recycle.cebaf.gov> wrote: > >I stand by my ordered list (and I thought of one more): > 1. Run needed software > 2. Never crash > 3. Run fast > 4. Use cheap hardware > >I believe we all win when Linux and *BSD attempt to outdo >each other on all three categories, and (for my needs anyway) >they are miles ahead of Microsoft's offerings. > I agree with you Larry, very very strongly. Competition will cause there to be superior product in the marketplace. John Dyson dyson@freebsd.org