Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mira.net.au!inquo!news.uoregon.edu!news.u.washington.edu!caj From: caj@tower.stc.housing.washington.edu (Craig Johnston) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: FreeBSD-stable? Date: 7 Feb 1996 05:12:06 GMT Organization: Private FreeBSD site, Seattle, WA Lines: 15 Message-ID: <4f9cb6$etp@nntp5.u.washington.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: tower.stc.housing.washington.edu Ok.. there's a FAQ on -current but I was unable to find anything on -stable. (please hit me in the head with something heavy and blunt if I missed it.) I assume -stable is 2.1.0-release with bugfixes, i.e. more stable than 2.1.0? Is it possible to get a list somewhere of the differences between -release and -stable? May one run a -stable kernel with the rest of a -release source tree without horrible things happening? Thanks in advance for enlightenment, either via answer or blunt object. -- Craig Johnston -- caj@tower.stc.housing.washington.edu