*BSD News Article 61157


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!newshub.csu.net!mars!hshaw
From: hshaw@mars.calstatela.edu (-FORGE-)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Linux and FreeBSD:  Differences?
Date: 3 Feb 1996 22:56:19 GMT
Organization: Information Resources and Technology
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <4f0p6j$2sq@nuke.csu.net>
References: <4drq9h$o2m@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> <4eijr5$mrt@venus.os.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mars.calstatela.edu

Craig Shrimpton (craigs@os.com) wrote:
: In article <4drq9h$o2m@nnrp1.news.primenet.com>,
:    ahupp@primenet.com (Adam Hupp) wrote:
: >I have read alot of documentation from both Linux and BSD.  Could
: >someone tell me the differences between the two?  Is one considered
: >better than the other or is it a matter of taste? 

: There were eight major differences between the two that I considered when 
: choosing FreeBSD or Linux.

: 1) FreeBSD is secure, Linux is not. (Linux has way too many suid programs)

: 2) If you run INN, FreeBSD is the way to go.

: 3) FreeBSD has faster networking than Linux.

: 4) Linux has better screen and keyboard features.

: 5) Linux makes a better web server. (Apache seemed "snappier" on Linux)

: 6) FreeBSD is "brain dead" simple to set-up. (Linux took a year to set-up, 
: FreeBSD about an hour)
[snip]
	Craig.. if it took you a year to setup Linux ( which took me about an
hour after d/l the boot and root disks), you sure your a consultant?


: Craig

: Shrimpton Consulting				Orbit Systems
: Craig Shrimpton					Email: craigs@os.com
: 17 Monroe Avenue				Phone: (508)753-8776
: Worcester, MA 01602				http://www.os.com/

--
T.Shaw
EE/CS student
California State University, Los Angeles