Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!zombie.ncsc.mil!news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!van-bc!uniserve!usenet From: tom@uniserve.com (Tom Samplonius) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,,comp.unix.bsd.misc Subject: Re: BSDI vs FreeBSD Followup-To: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.misc Date: 6 Feb 1996 18:33:29 GMT Organization: UNIServe Online Lines: 17 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4f86tp$5ki@atlas.uniserve.com> References: <AFj4X5nCg4@qsar.chem.msu.su> <4f6eir$odk@news.quanta.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pc.sdf.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.6 Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:13391 comp.unix.bsd.misc:488 In article <4f6eir$odk@news.quanta.com>, rsww@quanta.coml says... >give some better performance. BSDI has more device drivers, but a lot If that were only so. You shoud say that BSDI supports different things. BSDI does not have support for: * Adaptec 2742, 2842, 2940 * No PCI ethernet cards at all: including DEC based cards which FreeBSD supports * No 100mbs ethernet support at all, including DEC and Intel cards which FreeBSD supports (Info taken from www.bsdi.com) Tom