*BSD News Article 60612


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.bhp.com.au!mel.dit.csiro.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.uoknor.edu!news.nodak.edu!netnews1.nwnet.net!news.u.washington.edu!uw-beaver!uhog.mit.edu!news.mathworks.com!fu-berlin.de!news.dfn.de!news.uni-jena.de!news.HRZ.HAB-Weimar.DE!News.HTWM.De!news.tu-chemnitz.de!irz401!uriah.heep!news
From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Restricted Shell
Date: 26 Jan 1996 23:36:04 GMT
Organization: Private BSD site, Dresden
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <4eboh4$ke2@uriah.heep.sax.de>
References: <4e5qpf$5ds@news.service.uci.edu>
Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.heep.sax.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.3

ssapozni@rex.lib.uci.edu (Sam Sapoznick) writes:

> Is there a pre-compiled Restricted Shell available for BSD 2.0.5 or
> 2.1 anywhere? I already looked on ftp.freebsd.org. Source could do
> if there's no binary. Also, isn't the restricted shell a somewhat
> standard utility? Could that be included perhaps in the next FreeBSD
> release?

No.  No.  No.  (You've got three question marks there. :)

The so-called restricted shell is mostly being used as a security
hole, so you don't really want to have it anyway.  98 % of the people
asking for it intend to use it as an (in)secure login shell, and
that's exactly the least suitable purpose of it.  Create a chroot'ed
environment if you care for security.

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)