Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.sysv386:24396 comp.unix.sys5.r4:134 comp.unix.sys5.r3:17 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:237 comp.unix.bsd:6051 comp.os.linux:11677 comp.os.mach:2245 comp.windows.x:45856 Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386,comp.unix.sys5.r4,comp.unix.sys5.r3,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.linux,comp.os.mach,comp.windows.x Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!wupost!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!att!fang!gator!larry From: larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder) Subject: Re: Announcing the availability of XFree86 1.1 Message-ID: <BvKoDJ.C06@gator.rn.com> Organization: The Gator Conferencing System 219-289-3745 References: <BvK6ny.H2J@news.udel.edu> <1992Oct3.192551.1831@netcom.com> <1992Oct3.215041.17541@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 01:05:43 GMT Lines: 15 dwex@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (david.e.wexelblat) writes: >This, by the way, is a perfect example of why SVR4 is better than SCO. >We have a single binary kit, ~20MB compressed, that works on SVR4 from 7 >different vendors. There are NO (none, nada, zip, zero) differences. Not >in the server, not in the clients, not in the libraries. And the server >(under SVR4.0.4, anyhow) supports local connections from SCO binaries >(i.e. I run an SCO binary on my SVR4 box, and it just works). Likewise, we still (believe it or not) run SCO Xenix binaries here -- and they run just fine under SVR4 4.0 -- Larry Snyder internet: larry@gator.rn.com keeper of the Gator uucp: uunet!gator!larry