*BSD News Article 59561


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!paladin.american.edu!gatech!news.mathworks.com!news.kei.com!sundog.tiac.net!tencats.rmkhome.com!rmk
From: rmk@rmkhome.com (Rick Kelly)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc,comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: ISP hardware/software choices (performance comparison)
Followup-To: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc,comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.aix
Date: 20 Jan 1996 05:53:20 GMT
Organization: The Man With Ten Cats
Lines: 56
Distribution: inet
Message-ID: <4dq00g$ala@sundog.tiac.net>
References: <4cmopu$d35@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <cnordin.821050414@news.vni.net> <4crliv$smk@olympus.nwnet.net> <4cuums$bi1@helena.MT.net> <30F8483A.7187@commerce.uq.edu.au> <4dbv1d$j2f@park.uvsc.edu>
Reply-To: rmk@tencats.rmkhome.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: tencats.rmkhome.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:1941 comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc:2086 comp.unix.solaris:57179 comp.unix.aix:68670

Terry Lambert (terry@lambert.org) wrote:
: David Bellamy <bellamy@commerce.uq.edu.au> wrote:
: ] > >It can take a week to get a machine to simply recognize two SCSI
: ] > >controllers.  Nobody expects you to put two into a machine, so nobody
: ] > >tells you the convolutions needed to do so.
: ] > 
: ] > You'll have the same problem with PC unices as you do with SUN/DEC/SGI
: ] > workstations.  How do I stick one in my Sparc 10, I've avoided doing it
: ] > simply because it's a pain?  (BTW - I know how, it's almost *exactly*
: ] > the same procedure as doing it under any of the BSD's)
: ] 
: ] 
: ] That must be something peculiar to BSD (SunOS 4.x ??).  Under SunOS 5.4,
: ] 
: ] touch /reconfigure
: ] power down and install new SCSI-2 card
: ] boot
: ] There it is.

: I think Nate's comment was regarding the ability of the card
: to subsequently operate reliably.

: [ ... ]

: ] >  Software support isn't perfect on *ANY* OS
: ] > you choose, but if you stick with the standard OS's already discussed
: ] > you'll be pretty safe.
: ]  
: ] You'd probably also want to pick one that is being actively developed
: ] and enhanced - all this WWW stuff is introducing stresses and demands on
: ] an OS that no one could have dreamed of.  BSD derived systems are pretty
: ] well dead (yes I'm sure there is an exception, somewhere) but most
: ] mainstream suppliers now are using SVR4 derived systems.

: The exception you are thinking of is probably freefall.cdrom.com,
: arguably the most active site on the net.

: It is a FreeBSD system.

: FreeBSD is being actively developed and enhanced.

Give him a better list:

NetBSD
FreeBSD
BSDI BSD/OS	as commercial as you can get

falling through the cracks:

OSF/1

And then there is the Taiwanese source licensee of SunOS 4.1.3 who is
probably just waiting for Sun to get out of the BSD business.
--
Rick Kelly  rmk@tencats.rmkhome.com  rmk@rmkhome.com 
            http://tencats.rmkhome.com