*BSD News Article 58934


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!zombie.ncsc.mil!news.mathworks.com!fu-berlin.de!zrz.TU-Berlin.DE!zib-berlin.de!news.tu-chemnitz.de!irz401!uriah.heep!news
From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: ld.so errors
Date: 7 Jan 1996 11:09:07 GMT
Organization: Private BSD site, Dresden
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <4co9kj$8cb@uriah.heep.sax.de>
References: <30EEF166.41C67EA6@vt.edu>
Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.heep.sax.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.3

Ryan Schutt <rschutt@vt.edu> writes:
> I get the following error when trying to run display from
> ImageMagick :
> 
> ld.so: display: libMagick.so.3.6: Undefined error: 0
> 
> I get the following error when trying to run xpaint:
> 
> ld.so: xpaint: libtiff.so.3.3: Undefined error: 0

You need to install libMagick.so.3.6 and libtiff.so.3.3, they are most
likely separate packages.  Don't forget to re-run ldconfig (or reboot
the system).

> I get the following error when running dip:
> 
> ld.so: warning: libc.so.2.1: minor version < 2 expected, using
> it anyway

You've got the dip package that was linked against libc.so.2.2, but
you only have a libc.so.2.1 around.  The dynamic linker is telling you
that it's using the 2.1 version anyway (which will only cause trouble
in case your application actually needs one of the added functions of
the new shared lib).

> So, what's up with my ld.so or whatever ?!?!?!?  Where can I
> get a newer ld.so?

You don't need a newer ld.so. :-)

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)