*BSD News Article 58772


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!news.voicenet.com!news
From: The Notorious B.S.D. (The Notorious B.S.D.)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc,comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: ISP hardware/software choices (performance comparison)
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 1996 08:39:58 GMT
Organization: Voicenet - Internet Access - (215)674-9290
Lines: 38
Distribution: inet
Message-ID: <4d4s3u$u3@news.voicenet.com>
References: <4cmopu$d35@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4crnbe$8a@olympus.nwnet.net> <4cs2kn$kfg@cynic.portal.ca> <4cu7t0$mg5@engnews2.Eng.Sun.COM> <4cv8j1$59k@park.uvsc.edu> <4cvjpk$rpf@durban.vector.co.za>
NNTP-Posting-Host: philly306.voicenet.com
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent v0.55
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:1794 comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc:1911 comp.unix.solaris:56203 comp.unix.aix:67870

gavin@durban.vector.co.za (Gavin Maltby) wrote:


>No developer looks at Solaris 2 and say "I am glad none of those
>features are in SunOS 4".  

i do! from a development standpoint, cramming in more features
guarantees slower performance,  and more !BUGS!


>OK so having to use the SVID etc in 
>development might not be what everyone would love,  but I suspect
>that a lot of people like the BSD enviroment just because that is
>what they *know* and they refuse to adapt and learn the intracies
>of the new interface.

naw, i've used both about an equal amount. While SVR4 looks good in
the manpages, it gets SMOKED by the rock-steady performance of BSD.

>Solaris = SVR4 + a lot of features!  

gee, great...see my first comment.

>What you are really bitter about
>is that BSD style UNIX did not win out or reach critical mass over
>SVR4.  That's something you just have to deal with---it happened and
>isn't about to unravel.

by your logic,  MS-DOS is great simply because enough pinheads lined
up behind the IBM name and bought, right?

and now, you say SVR4.* is great because another bunch of dopes saw
the AT&T logo and opened their wallets (Sun, and lots of others)

i think i'm beginning to see your point....NOT!