*BSD News Article 58757


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!paladin.american.edu!zombie.ncsc.mil!news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news.ios.com!news2.ios.com!rk.ios.com!rashid
From: rashid@rk.ios.com (Rashid  Karimov)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: 128MB Ram
Date: 2 Jan 1996 20:03:52 GMT
Organization: Internet Online Services
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <4cc338$1um@news2.ios.com>
References: <4bv73t$faa@sundog.tiac.net> <4c1vtk$b4r@uriah.heep.sax.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: rk.ios.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]


J Wunsch (j@uriah.heep.sax.de) wrote:
: pete@millenium.tiac.net (Pete Davis) writes:
: > 
: > Does anybody know if there is a real way to make a machine recognize 128MB
: > of ram?  It appears that my kernel only recognizes 64MB.  Is there anyway
: > to do this without hacking?  If I need to hack it, what is the best
: > way to go about doing so?

: The CMOS doesn't allow for more than 64 MB.

: Look into /sys/i386/i386/machdep.c, search for ``MAXMEM''.  I think
: that's the constant you gotta tweak with.

	The old 2.05 didn't allow to specify the MAXMEM define
	in the kernel config file - so the hack was actually 
	neede back then.

	Now just define 
	define "MAXMEM=131092" 
	in the config file and recompile the thing ... 
	you'll probably have to define LARGEMEM as
	well ... dunno if it's required ...


	Rashid


: -- 
: cheers, J"org

: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
: Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)


--
                             ------------------

               Beyond the horizon of the place we lived when we were young
               In the world of magnets and miracles
               Our thoughts strayed constantly and without boundary
               The ringing of the division bell had begun ...
                        -=PF, The Division Bell=-