Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!Austria.EU.net!news.aut.alcatel.at!atusc74!ladavac From: ladavac@aut.alcatel.at (Marino Ladavac) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: GPL (was Re: Linux vs FreeBSD) Followup-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Date: 2 Jan 1996 15:41:21 GMT Organization: Alcatel Austria AG Lines: 10 Message-ID: <4cbjn1$9g4@atusks02.aut.alcatel.at> References: <489kuu$rbo@pelican.cs.ucla.edu> <4b67mo$19l@dyson.iquest.net> <SJA.95Dec28115305@beta.hut.fi> <4c03ao$qpu@news.aloha.com> <4c13sj$ebc@nntpb.cb.att.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: atusc74.aut.alcatel.at X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.advocacy:32784 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:11920 John S. Dyson (dyson@inuxs.inh.att.com) wrote: : The main difference between : the two aforementioned deals is that Microsoft's agenda is probably to make : money, and part of the agenda associated with the GPL appears to enforce : a political or economic belief. I wonder which is more honorable??? Neither? /Alby