Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!msunews!netnews.upenn.edu!news.voicenet.com!news From: Marines! (Marines!) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc Subject: Re: BSDI Vs. NT... NT looses big Date: Sat, 23 Dec 1995 01:57:43 GMT Organization: Voicenet - Internet Access - (215)674-9290 Lines: 27 Message-ID: <4bfdgi$mb8@news.voicenet.com> References: <taxfree.3.00C439A1@primenet.com> <4bdd76$a04@news.voicenet.com> <4bdulp$4r8@mail.fwi.uva.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: philly48.voicenet.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent v0.55 casper@fwi.uva.nl (Casper H.S. Dik) wrote: >Casper >-- >Casper Dik - Network Security Engineer - Sun Microsystems Sun, huh? At least this group uses a BSD variant, not that horrible SYSV mess you guys try to sell. Solaris sucks hard. At least there's a battle between BSD and NT. Solaris tries to be NT with lots of awful GUI-based administration, and fails miserably. It tries to network like BSDI, and again, like admintool, it looks like a fish out of water. Solaris and SYSV on the whole is pretty much a non-factor anymore. No matter who finally ends up with the license. Yet the geniuses at Sun decided that Solaris (SYSV) was the 'upgrade' to the venerable SunOS (BSD). And we should trust YOU? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!