Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!paladin.american.edu!zombie.ncsc.mil!nntp.coast.net!news.sprintlink.net!news1!not-for-mail From: root@dyson.iquest.net (John S. Dyson) Subject: Re: GPL (was Re: Linux vs FreeBSD) X-Nntp-Posting-Host: dyson.iquest.net Message-ID: <4ccib0$8p@dyson.iquest.net> Sender: news@iquest.net (News Admin) Organization: John S. Dyson's home machine References: <489kuu$rbo@pelican.cs.ucla.edu> <4c03ao$qpu@news.aloha.com> <4c13sj$ebc@nntpb.cb.att.com> <4cbjn1$9g4@atusks02.aut.alcatel.at> Date: Wed, 3 Jan 1996 00:24:00 GMT Lines: 14 Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.advocacy:31673 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:11260 In article <4cbjn1$9g4@atusks02.aut.alcatel.at>, Marino Ladavac <ladavac@aut.alcatel.at> wrote: >John S. Dyson (dyson@inuxs.inh.att.com) wrote: >: The main difference between >: the two aforementioned deals is that Microsoft's agenda is probably to make >: money, and part of the agenda associated with the GPL appears to enforce >: a political or economic belief. I wonder which is more honorable??? > >Neither? > EXACTLY!!! Neither is intrinsically more moral (IMO.) John Dyson