Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.admin,alt.os.linux,alt.uu.comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.exodus.net!news.wni.com!noc.netcom.net!loach.org!news4.noc.netcom.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!stephenk From: stephenk@netcom.com (Stephen Knilans) Subject: Re: Coherent answer to questions about Linux vs. FreeBSD Message-ID: <stephenkDKA7o2.Csr@netcom.com> Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest) References: <30D2FB7F.52C1@ix.netcom.com> <4b089j$usb@twin.wasatch.com> <1995Dec19.232510.8284@rosevax.rosemount.com> Date: Thu, 28 Dec 1995 05:38:26 GMT Lines: 23 Sender: stephenk@netcom8.netcom.com Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.admin:36412 alt.os.linux:6734 alt.uu.comp.os.linux.questions:5335 comp.os.linux.advocacy:31566 comp.os.linux.misc:77450 comp.os.linux.setup:33714 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:11205 In article <1995Dec19.232510.8284@rosevax.rosemount.com> grante@reddwarf.rosemount.com (Grant Edwards) writes: >Bob Hauck (bobh@wasatch.com) wrote: > >: Too bad about MWC. I had heard that Coherent was a decent product, >: and the price was certainly right. > >It is a bit sad. It was a good product, with excellent documentation. I >suspect that Net/FreeBSD and Linux were the proximate cause of death -- MWC >just couldn't keep up. So far, the only casualty in the war against >Microsoft's hegemony seems to be the death of one of the good guys as a >result of friendly fire. > The first version of coherent was VERY IN-coherent. It was 100% FALSE ADVERTISING! MANY were angry. The 386 version was a LOT better, but STILL didn't live up to promises. Their tech support STUNK, and they try to break into your system if you give them a chance. Linux is MUCH better! LESS buggy, CHEAPER, more capable/compatible! Steve