Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!chi-news.cic.net!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!agate!news.ucdavis.edu!not-for-mail From: obrien@cs.ucdavis.edu (David E. O'Brien) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: Questions about Linux vs. FreeBSD... Date: 15 Dec 1995 10:46:14 GMT Organization: University of California, Davis Lines: 12 Message-ID: <4arjlm$5l5@mark.ucdavis.edu> References: <4ajc07$sb7@unix2.glink.net.hk> <4ao0f8$1qc@pell.pell.chi.il.us> <4aodm3$gcj@exit.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: toadflax.cs.ucdavis.edu X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0] Frank Mayhar (frank@exit.com) wrote: : In article <4ao0f8$1qc@pell.pell.chi.il.us>, Orc <orc@pell.chi.il.us> wrote: : : Hah. You're just jealous. FreeBSD 2.1 is the One True Operating System, : and your recent hardware problems would never have happened had you been : running it. : Can't be, it is not written in the 1TBS (one true brace style - aka k&r style). :-)) -- David (obrien@cs.ucdavis.edu)