Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!sgigate.sgi.com!wetware!wsrcc.com!news.orst.edu!news.uidaho.edu!usenet From: "Faried Nawaz" <fn@uidaho.edu> Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: ps weirdness Date: 10 Dec 1995 03:50:18 -0800 Organization: People's Front Against WWW Lines: 10 Sender: nawaz921@waldrog.cs.uidaho.edu Distribution: world Message-ID: <imspiti1dx.fsf@waldrog.cs.uidaho.edu> References: <4a9066$1tqk@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> Reply-To: fn@uidaho.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: waldrog.cs.uidaho.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Newsreader: September Gnus v0.15 In article <4a9066$1tqk@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> schweikh@itosun.ito.uni-stuttgart.de (Jens Schweikhardt) writes: $ - Why are all TIME fields 0:00.00? (top(1), however, reports TIME > 0) $ - Why is the output not sorted by PID although ps(1) says it should be? $ - Why are all processes in parentheses? Where are the invocation options? $ - I read the notes in the handbook about ps not working with new kernels $ but shouldn't it work with the generic kernel from the same release? $ - What did I screw up? do you have procfs mounted?