Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!metro!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!fnnews.fnal.gov!gw1.att.com!nntpa!not-for-mail From: dyson@inuxs.inh.att.com (John S. Dyson) Subject: Re: Questions about Linux vs. FreeBSD... Message-ID: <DJsIDD.85u@nntpa.cb.att.com> Sender: news@nntpa.cb.att.com (Netnews Administration) Nntp-Posting-Host: inuxs.inh.att.com Organization: AT&T References: <4at6u9$7i8@fohnix.metronet.com> <4av4vk$988@helena.MT.net> <4b0ukh$20g@dyson.iquest.net> <4b20q3$tk6@daffy.anetsrvcs.uwrf.edu> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1995 16:12:49 GMT Lines: 12 Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au alt.os.linux:6496 comp.os.linux.advocacy:30698 comp.os.linux.misc:76172 comp.os.linux.setup:32778 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:10695 In article <4b20q3$tk6@daffy.anetsrvcs.uwrf.edu>, BENJAMIN A LINDSTROM <bl03@uwrf.edu> wrote: >: ><laugh>...Why would I 'taint' my companies source code under BSD either?? =) >That's just about as bad.=) You and I simply disagree... BSD is a much simpler and less restrictive license (IMO.) John dyson@freebsd.org