Return to BSD News archive
#! rnews 1526 bsd
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!news00.sunet.se!sunic!news99.sunet.se!news.funet.fi!news.abo.fi!not-for-mail
From: mandtbac@news.abo.fi (Mats Andtbacka)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.advocacy
Subject: Re: Linux vs FreeBSD
Followup-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.advocacy
Date: 7 Dec 1995 18:30:32 GMT
Organization: Unorganized Usenet Postings UnInc.
Lines: 17
Distribution: comp
Message-ID: <4a7bs8$cap@josie.abo.fi>
References: <489kuu$rbo@pelican.cs.ucla.edu> <49o2n2$t4e@daffy.anetsrvcs.uwrf.edu>
Reply-To: mandtbac@abo.fi
NNTP-Posting-Host: escher.abo.fi
X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950520BETA PL0]
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.advocacy:30588 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:10615 comp.unix.advocacy:12279
Michael L. VanLoon, in <MICHAELV.95Dec6214734@MindBender.HeadCandy.com>:
>The Linux Documentation Project was a necessity because the Linux
>directory structure was turning into such a convoluted and
>self-conflicting mess.
You're confusing the Linux Doc Project with the Linux File System
Standard (FSSTND). Hope this helps.
>BSD had an established and well thought out directory hierarchy before
>Linux even existed.
Well, you can't rightly expect Linux to have had a standardized
directory tree before there was such a thing as Linux, after all.
--
" ... got to contaminate to alleviate this loneliness
i now know the depths i reach are limitless... "
-- nin