Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!chi-news.cic.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!plug.news.pipex.net!pipex!dish.news.pipex.net!pipex!lade.news.pipex.net!pipex!handbag.tecc.co.uk!parody.tecc.co.uk!not-for-mail From: james@parody.tecc.co.uk (James Raynard) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.os.linux,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc Subject: Re: a monthly FreeBSD magazine (and other *BSD's too) Date: 17 Dec 1995 00:23:19 -0000 Organization: A FreeBSD box Lines: 26 Message-ID: <4avntn$21u@parody.tecc.co.uk> References: <4ajc07$sb7@unix2.glink.net.hk> <4au4fo$pbo@agate.berkeley.edu> <4av02t$706@shellx.best.com> <4aveq6$ca6@agate.berkeley.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.advocacy:30536 alt.os.linux:6460 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:10594 comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:1568 In article <4aveq6$ca6@agate.berkeley.edu>, Nick Kralevich <nickkral@parker.EECS.Berkeley.EDU> wrote: > >Whoa! Wait a second. What the hell are you talking about? Where >in this thread did I EVER talk about documentation? Perhaps your >confusing me with someone else, and if so, I would appreciate an >apology. If I did say somthing about documentation, then perhaps you >can requote it, so I can have a chance to defend myself. Actually, if I remember correctly, you have not said anything at all about documentation in this thread (or anywhere else in c.u.b.f.m recently) and so that particular accusation is unfounded. However, you did post an article in another thread, complete with quotations from several news postings which you claimed proved that FreeBSD kernel development was more closed than Linux because it didn't have CVS access to the sources. This claim was subsequently comprehensively demolished, possibly because Linux didn't have CVS access either. So any confusion is quite understandable 8-) Cheers James -- Segmentation fault (core dumped): cannot find file '.signature'