*BSD News Article 56412


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!news.dfn.de!newsjunkie.ans.net!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.kei.com!nntp.et.byu.edu!news.caldera.com!park.uvsc.edu!usenet
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.advocacy
Subject: Re: Linux vs FreeBSD
Date: 9 Dec 1995 09:34:06 GMT
Organization: Utah Valley State College, Orem, Utah
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <4abl6e$pqr@park.uvsc.edu>
References: <489kuu$rbo@pelican.cs.ucla.edu> <DJ2JEp.7Ky@nntpa.cb.att.com> <4a2oii$m7h@daffy.anetsrvcs.uwrf.edu> <4a5765$h5n@mercury.mcs.com> <4a7385$50q@rover.village.org> <4a8gs2$eun@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hecate.artisoft.com
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.advocacy:29779 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:10071 comp.unix.advocacy:11938

dan@dna.neusc.bcm.tmc.edu wrote:
]
] In <4a7385$50q@rover.village.org>, imp@village.org (Warner Losh) writes:
] )In article <4a5765$h5n@mercury.mcs.com>, Leslie Mikesell <les@MCS.COM> wrote:
] )>Speaking of file systems, are there any plans for a file system that
] )>Linux, freebsd and Windows NT can all read so you could build
] )>a dual-boot machine that could always get to the same files?
] )
] )It's called FAT :-)
] 
] 	Is the Freebsd FAT still broken ? (i.e. not safe to write...)

Depends.  Is you partition a multiple of the cluster size, or
did you use FIPS to shrink your DOS partition?  Using FIPS is
apparently what makes it go to hell.


                                        Terry Lambert
                                        terry@cs.weber.edu
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.