Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!yarrina.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.hawaii.edu!ames!hookup!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!paperboy.wellfleet.com!news3.near.net!shore!news
From: witr@spooky.rwwa.com
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Parity SIMMS really necessary?
Date: 3 Dec 1995 16:31:25 GMT
Organization: R.W. Withrow Associates
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <49sjct$e91@shore.shore.net>
References: <49lbnr$4fq@interport.net> <49qabp$efi@zuul.nmti.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: rwwa.com
Peter da Silva wrote in article <49qabp$efi@zuul.nmti.com> :
>The whole idea of putting that much memory in a box without at *least*
>parity (and preferably ECC) makes me sick in the stomach.
Well, it all depends on BER. But is ECC even an option? What
MBs support ECC, and with which SIMMS?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Withrow, Tel: +1 617 598 4480, Fax: +1 617 598 4430 Net: witr@rwwa.COM
R.W. Withrow Associates, 319 Lynnway Suite 201, Lynn MA 01901 USA