Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!goanna.cs.rmit.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!paladin.american.edu!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.kreonet.re.kr!overload.lbl.gov!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news.cac.psu.edu!news.math.psu.edu!chi-news.cic.net!news.midplains.net!gw2.att.com!nntpa!not-for-mail From: dyson@inuxs.inh.att.com (John S. Dyson) Subject: Re: what is the status of porting ext2 fs to FreeBSD? Message-ID: <DHuB1q.94F@nntpa.cb.att.com> Sender: news@nntpa.cb.att.com (Netnews Administration) Nntp-Posting-Host: inuxs.inh.att.com Organization: AT&T References: <oviovx9xf.fsf@vapor.Franz.COM> <47rirf$sq8@xymox.dsw.com> <47tofp$kvp@park.uvsc.edu> <oag6575zo.fsf@vapor.franz.com> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 18:22:37 GMT Lines: 17 In article <oag6575zo.fsf@vapor.franz.com>, Kevin Layer <layer@Franz.COM> wrote: >In article <47tofp$kvp@park.uvsc.edu> Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> writes: > > 2) It's already in the -current source tree. If you SUP > -current, then you have it on your machine now. > >Does this mean it'll be in 2.1R? A previous poster said 2.2. > It cannot be as the deadline for 2.1R is long past... It should not be too difficult to back-port though. The hardest part of the port was to make it work with the merged VM/Buffer cache (about 40 lines of code), and that scheme is pretty much the same in 2.1R and 2.2-current. John dyson@freebsd.org