*BSD News Article 54402


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!goanna.cs.rmit.EDU.AU!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!matlock.mindspring.com!usenet
From: Robert Sanders <rsanders@mindspring.com>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc
Subject: Re: ISDN for NetBSD
Date: 05 Nov 1995 09:45:16 -0500
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises, Inc.
Lines: 19
Sender: rsanders@hrothgar.mindspring.com
Message-ID: <87lopv86ir.fsf@hrothgar.mindspring.com>
References: <46gifk$d2n@cousteau.norcen.com> <46j86v$7u7@mozo.cc.purdue.edu>
	<DH2tFH.GJx@GTS.NET> <47egb7$1bh@cynic.portal.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hrothgar.mindspring.com
In-reply-to: curt@portal.ca's message of 3 Nov 1995 17:40:55 -0800
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.0.10

On 3 Nov 1995 17:40:55 -0800, curt@portal.ca (Curt Sampson) said:

> Let's just say that the short-term savings of buying an ISDN card
> rather than a router may not be as high as the long-term savings
> in hair-restoring lotion if you go the other way.

Although we use them in great abundance here, I'd never to so far as
to call the Ascend Pipelines *good* routers.  Their sole routing
protocol is RIPv1 and their routing table doesn't fully support
classless addressing yet.

For home and small offices they're tolerable, but for anything more
serious I'd prefer a solid ISDN card or TA on a sync serial port under
one of the source-available *BSDs.

  -- Robert

-- 
MindSpring: use us and nobody gets hurt.