*BSD News Article 53743


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.uwa.edu.au!classic.iinet.com.au!swing.iinet.net.au!news.uoregon.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!col.hp.com!sdd.hp.com!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!noc.netcom.net!tweety.uscs.com!news
From: scotte@center.uscs.com (L. Scott Emmons)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: 2.0.5 on Intel EtherExpress
Date: 27 Oct 1995 18:08:22 GMT
Organization: U.S. Computer Services Research Center, El Dorado Hills, CA
Lines: 19
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <SCOTTE.95Oct27110822@odie.center.uscs.com>
References: <SCOTTE.95Oct18074604@odie.center.uscs.com> <YkXajVq00YUsA3P1Ip@andrew.cmu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: odie.center.uscs.com
To: Robert N Watson <rnw+@andrew.cmu.edu>
In-reply-to: Robert N Watson's message of Wed, 25 Oct 1995 12:54:57 -0400

In article <YkXajVq00YUsA3P1Ip@andrew.cmu.edu> Robert N Watson <rnw+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:

> We never got FreeBSD to handle our Intel Etherexpress cards.
> [...]  In the end
> There was some suggestion that users should watch for the Intel
> Etherexpress Pro vs the old intel etherexpress.  You might check
> which you have..

Thanks for your response! I gave up on the Intel card and swapped it
for a 16bit 3c503. It may be slow, but at least it works. All is now
well...

Thanks,
Scott
-- 
__________________________________________________________________________
  L. Scott Emmons       | CableData R&D Center - El Dorado Hills, CA, USA
   (916)939-6088        |  >> Standard disclaimer applies. Views are my <<
scotte@center.uscs.com  |  >> own, not those of U.S. Computer Services. <<