Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yarrina.connect.com.au!classic.iinet.com.au!swing.iinet.net.au!news.uoregon.edu!news.emf.net!overload.lbl.gov!lll-winken.llnl.gov!uwm.edu!chi-news.cic.net!news.wctc.net!spcuna!tzlink.j51.com!lepslog From: lepslog@j51.com (Louis Epstein) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. BSDI Date: 15 Oct 1995 03:29:46 GMT Organization: TZ-Link, a public-access online community in Nyack, NY. Lines: 12 Message-ID: <45pv7a$7td@tzlink.j51.com> References: <45bt9b$ism@tzlink.j51.com> <DG7xJM.6xJ@ritz.mordor.com> <45hthc$qcd@tzlink.j51.com> <45l64r$3jv@uriah.heep.sax.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: j51.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] J Wunsch (j@uriah.heep.sax.de) wrote: : Louis Epstein <lepslog@j51.com> wrote: : >One person who responded by email said that BSDI was more stable than : >FreeBSD. : That might be possible. Anyway, FreeBSD is not the unstablest system : at all, consider the load of ftp.cdrom.com as an example. :-) : I think both systems are as stable as the underlying hardware. Well,I'll shortly provide laboratory evidence on the AMD 486 DX4-120...