Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!lerc.nasa.gov!purdue!news.bu.edu!acs2.bu.edu!mi From: mi@bu.edu (Mikhail Teterin) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: Linux Killer App (ksmbfs) Date: 11 Oct 1995 00:39:27 GMT Organization: Boston University Lines: 19 Message-ID: <45f3nv$3jh@news.bu.edu> References: <44cma4$fv4@hole.sdsu.edu> <44f0v9$83@park.uvsc.edu> <44hn74$pbj@hole.sdsu.edu> <454aet$oja@park.uvsc.edu> <457flc$2iq@hole.sdsu.edu> <45c82b$mki@park.uvsc.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: acs2.bu.edu X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Some time ago (9 Oct 1995 22:34:50 GMT) honorable Terry Lambert, residing at terry@cs.weber.edu wrote: |I think something like ksmbfs is worthwhile only for single user |desktop machines, where a single client credential universally |applied to all FS services consumers on the platform is an |acceptable thing. |For the most part, I think both Linux and FreeBSD do *not* fall |into this definition. I am awfully sorry to raise my voice against the will of such a veteran, but the only two FreeBSD machines I've seen (100% of them (-: ) do fall into this definition. One I have at home, and the other one -- at work, where everybody else is using WinNT. At home, I have about 7 users, whom I trust (my wife and a few friends). At work -- I am the only user... -- hot-dog apple-pie baseball Chevrolet