*BSD News Article 5249


Return to BSD News archive

Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!fcom.cc.utah.edu!cs.weber.edu!terry
From: terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C)
Subject: Re: Motif for 386BSD
Message-ID: <1992Sep18.180252.2735@fcom.cc.utah.edu>
Keywords: Motif 386BSD
Sender: news@fcom.cc.utah.edu
Organization: Weber State University  (Ogden, UT)
References: <Buq358.4up@pix.com> <1992Sep17.174014.11673@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <Bury0x.Bz6@pix.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 92 18:02:52 GMT
Lines: 27

In article <Bury0x.Bz6@pix.com> stripes@pix.com (Josh Osborne) writes:
>I have used OPEN LOOK on X terminals (Pix does lots of work messing with
>X terminal X servers, so I use X terminals more offen then workstations,
>and in fact normally only use workstations when I am cross-debuging my
>X terminal...), and it doesn't suck.  Mabie your X terminals just suck :-)

Well, one can't argue with "free".  The problem appears to be that the
toolkit requires the "shape" extension, and these terminals ar X11R4.

>I understand, I just like OPEN LOOK better, so I wish someone would fuss
>about it instead...

Your religion is showing... 8-). 8-).  Not a problem, though -- I'd like
to have *both* Motif and OpenLook available.


					Terry Lambert
					terry_lambert@gateway.novell.com
					terry@icarus.weber.edu
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        "I have an 8 user poetic license" - me
 Get the 386bsd FAQ from agate.berkeley.edu:/pub/386BSD/386bsd-0.1/unofficial
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------