*BSD News Article 50924


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!swidir.switch.ch!newsfeed.ACO.net!Austria.EU.net!EU.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.edge.net!news
From: jeff@medsup.com (Jeff Bauer)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: FreeBSD dedicated NFS server
Date: 14 Sep 1995 18:14:05 GMT
Organization: Medical Support Services, Inc.
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <439rdd$mjk@excalibur.edge.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.183.147.30
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.2

We are interested in using FreeBSD as a dedicated NFS server.  I would 
like to hear from other people who have experience with this.  In 
particular I would like to address the following issues:

1.  We're presently using SCO, Linux, NT, and a proprietary NFS
    server from Network Appliance Corp. (FAServer).  I would prefer to
    put medium-critical data on a BSD server, however, because I believe
    this can be done relatively inexpensively.  FreeBSD would seem to
    be a better choice for this than Linux (for reasons of performance
    and reliability).  No flames please, I'm very fond of Linux :)

2.  I would like to have about 8GB capacity, with the ability to
    add more in the future.  -a- Can this be done with a single
    9GB drive with FreeBSD?  -b- Is anyone using low-cost raid 
    solutions?

3.  One of the advantages with our FAServer is that it has one huge
    physical filesystem which is organized by sysadmin into separate
    logical mounts.  The free space gets used by whoever needs it. 
    This might seem like a disadvantage in certain situations, but 
    as a practical matter this can be very convenient.  So my         
    longwinded question comes down to this:  What are the practical     
    maximum limits for FreeBSD:  Physical hard drives (number & size)?
                                 Filesystem (size/inodes)?

4.  What tape backup solutions are being used?  I would prefer not
    to change tapes during a master backup.  A possible consideration     
    would be to have 2 DAT drives -- with data compression this might     
    work.  Does anyone have experience with this or a better solution?

5.  I notice there is already a thread running in the newsgroup
    about boot disks and disaster recovery.  I would be interested
    in anyone's practical experience with this.

I will summarize if necessary, but as I think most responses will be 
of (relatively) general interest to this group.  Please don't suggest
RTFM, as I'm mostly interested in users practical experiences.  And
I *will* have to RTFM anyway :)