Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!shore!news
From: witr@spooky.rwwa.com
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: ld.so failed
Date: 6 Sep 1995 15:22:31 GMT
Organization: R.W. Withrow Associates
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <42kebn$9ph@shore.shore.net>
References: <42dk7r$r6n@shore.shore.net> <42idb0$b6k@helena.MT.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: rwwa.com
Nate Williams wrote in article <42idb0$b6k@helena.MT.net> :
>Such as?
Such as *why* it failed. I know one reason, and I assume there
are others. Why the need for the cryptic message? Oh Yeah...
>Remember, every byte added to the activator adds one byte to
>*every* single program in the entire tree. Bytes add up fast when you
>are talking hundreds or programs.
If we added 1024 bytes and we had 1024 programs, it would add a
whole Mb to the distribution. Big deal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Withrow, Tel: +1 617 598 4480, Fax: +1 617 598 4430 Net: witr@rwwa.COM
R.W. Withrow Associates, 319 Lynnway Suite 201, Lynn MA 01901 USA