*BSD News Article 50341


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!noc.netcom.net!netcom.com!csus.edu!csusac!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!psgrain!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news.mathworks.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!cs.utexas.edu!news.cs.utah.edu!news.cc.utah.edu!park.uvsc.edu!usenet
From: Terry Lambert <terry@cs.weber.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: FreeBSD page better than Linux?
Date: 6 Sep 1995 00:13:13 GMT
Organization: Utah Valley State College, Orem, Utah
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <42ip2p$8ku@park.uvsc.edu>
References: <42cnbp$mit@blackice.winternet.com> <42iejc$hkl@agate.berkeley.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hecate.artisoft.com
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:5509 comp.os.linux:58864

nickkral@parker.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (Nick Kralevich) wrote:
] In addition to what everyone else has said, one thing to keep in mind
] is that FreeBSD apps usually take more memory than Linux apps.
] FreeBSD seems to need/require a lot more swap space than Linux does.

There is a difference between "need/require more swap space" and
"utilize all available memory and swap space as cache", which you
are apparently missing.

Man vmstat from -current.


                                        Terry Lambert
                                        terry@cs.weber.edu
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.