*BSD News Article 50332


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!news.sprintlink.net!news.zeitgeist.net!usenet
From: "Amancio Hasty, Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: FreeBSD page better than Linux?
Date: 6 Sep 1995 02:34:22 GMT
Organization: TLGnet, a division of RGNet, Inc.
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <42j1be$4c1@kadath.zeitgeist.net>
References: <42cnbp$mit@blackice.winternet.com> <42iejc$hkl@agate.berkeley.edu> <42iicc$hlk@news.jf.intel.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: rah.star-gate.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT i386)
X-URL: news:42iicc$hlk@news.jf.intel.com

USER       PID %CPU %MEM   VSZ  RSS TT  STAT STARTED       TIME COMMAND
root     10658  8.4  9.2  3204 2800 ??  S    31Dec69    0:02.56 X :0 (XF86_S3)


Thats how big my FreeBSD XF86_S3 server is  with twm and two xterms....
I really doubt that the Linux version is going to be that much different
and my guess is going to be bigger 8)

	Amancio


haertel@ichips.intel.com (Mike Haertel) wrote:
>In article <42iejc$hkl@agate.berkeley.edu>,
>Nick Kralevich <nickkral@parker.EECS.Berkeley.EDU> wrote:
>>In addition to what everyone else has said, one thing to keep in mind
>>is that FreeBSD apps usually take more memory than Linux apps.
>>FreeBSD seems to need/require a lot more swap space than Linux does.
>
>If this is true, does anyone have any idea to what extent it might be
>because FreeBSD is still using the ancient powers-of-two Caltech malloc?
>--
>Mike Haertel <haertel@ichips.intel.com>

-- 
Amancio Hasty                       
Hasty Software Consulting Services
Tel:      415-495-3046
Fax:      415-495-3046
Cellular: 415-309-8434
e-mail:	  hasty@star-gate.com      Powered by FreeBSD