*BSD News Article 50323


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!agate!reason.cdrom.com!usenet
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.org>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: DEBATE:  BSD vs. Linux
Date: 2 Sep 1995 02:06:35 GMT
Organization: Walnut Creek CDROM
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <428e7b$oqo@reason.cdrom.com>
References: <4233kp$t8p@hilly.apci.net> <425a9b$89r@felix.junction.net> <425l95$85v@cnn.nas.nasa.gov> <42712r$lp6@reason.cdrom.com> <4276es$8c9@ussenterprise.ufp.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: time.cdrom.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT i386)
X-URL: news:4276es$8c9@ussenterprise.ufp.org
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:935 comp.os.linux.advocacy:19308

bicknell@ussenterprise.ufp.org (Leo Bicknell) wrote:
>In article <42712r$lp6@reason.cdrom.com>,
>Jordan K. Hubbard <jkh@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>>looks nice and I'd certainly like an ALPHA on my desk, but the smart money
>>still says look to the P6 if you're looking for performance and the largest
>>array of external options.  We certainly didn't back Intel because we liked the
>>instruction set! :-)
>
>	I'd like to mention that DEC Alphas are faster then the
>P6 will ever be, in fact they make it look like a Z80.  More

Sorry, I can see how my statement "look to the P6 if you're looking for
performance and .." would look like I was saying that the P6 beats the ALPHA's
pants off.  I know it does not, I was simply implying that if you wanted "good
performance" and a wide array of 3rd party add-ons, Intel is your best bet.  I
know that the fastest ALPHAs will run rings around the P6 (I worked for DEC at
one point and I'm a fan of both their ALPHA AND their Intel line of PCs).

However, I disagree that you can't build a workstation class machine out of a
PC.  It's *harder*, I'll certainly grant you that, and you really have to know
just which components to buy, but it can be done.  Workstation users are
spoiled for being able to take the machine out of the box, plug it in, turn it
on and go.  PC users have to whisper to eachother in dark alleyways and seedy
dockside bars, exchanging tips on just which motherboard to buy and how to
properly construct a rack mounted multi-SCSI-controller NFS fileserver
behemoth.

Most importantly, the PC market is amazingly huge and it feeds off its own
progress.  24 bit video cards that'll do 1152x900 @ 72 Hz can be had for 1/5
what an accellerated graphics card for a Sun workstation would cost.  You can
buy off-the-shelf memory and expansion hardware at the local Denny's while
you're waiting for your to go burger.  And at the high end, some rather nice
forced-cooling tower cases with hot-swappable power supplies and staggered-pin
connectors (so that power comes off before signal) are becoming available and I
can probably build you a pretty spiffy little fileserver or web beast that'll
plug directly into a T1 line for between $5K-$10K, depending on what you want.
If I wanted an ALPHA it would cost me $5000 just to get in the door, and then
I'd be up well past $10K in fitting it for all the same external parts.  For
the small to midsize business that can't afford to drop $20K on hardware, PCs
are a very tempting option.  Don't kid yourself!  I can show you P5 systems
supporting hundreds of users or hundreds of NFS users already today!
-- 
						Jordan