*BSD News Article 50187


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!news.sprintlink.net!news.zeitgeist.net!usenet
From: "Amancio Hasty, Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Why isn't NetBSD popular?
Date: 5 Sep 1995 05:35:07 GMT
Organization: TLGnet, a division of RGNet, Inc.
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <42gnib$8dg@kadath.zeitgeist.net>
References: <DDACyE.CBt@seas.ucla.edu> <VIXIE.95Aug14011302@wisdom.home.vix.com> <40nj98$8g2@news.belwue.de> <40rhfu$bgb@wolfe.wimsey.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: rah.star-gate.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT i386)
X-URL: news:40rhfu$bgb@wolfe.wimsey.com
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:918 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:5401

curt@cynic.portal.ca (Curt Sampson) wrote:

>Another person mentioned that one of the reasons he went with
>FreeBSD was that there were upgrades more often. This may be fine
>for personal systems, but there are circumstances in which frequent

Well, you sort have a point since if you want to keep your 
base level system you can because you have the entire source directory.
Now lets suppose that you want to develop software and that from
time to time you need to port an ancillary package which happens
to be well supported with the current OS version but not in the 
previous. What do you then? 

-- 
Amancio Hasty                       
Hasty Software Consulting Services
Tel:      415-495-3046
Fax:      415-495-3046
Cellular: 415-309-8434
e-mail:	  hasty@star-gate.com      Powered by FreeBSD