*BSD News Article 49881


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!news.kei.com!news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!reason.cdrom.com!usenet
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.org>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Bug in 2.0.5's dlopen() functionality
Date: 31 Aug 1995 23:35:39 GMT
Organization: Walnut Creek CDROM
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <425h0b$j2l@reason.cdrom.com>
References: <87pwhri1b7.fsf@hrothgar.mindspring.com>	<41s307$rfn@reason.cdrom.com> <874tyz6qdm.fsf@interbev.mindspring.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: time.cdrom.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT i386)
To: rsanders@mindspring.com
X-URL: news:874tyz6qdm.fsf@interbev.mindspring.com

Robert Sanders <rsanders@mindspring.com> wrote:
>Ick.  Is that intended, or just the current state of affairs?  ELF can
>handle recursive shared library dependencies, and it's very very nice.
>It certainly seems that this is something the current shared library
>system should be able to handle.  And I can swear that the current one
>at least made some effort to.  I guess it's time to RTFS. :)

Well, that's just my understanding of it given about a 15 minute attempt
to make this work myself.  I could be wrong, and a thorough attempt to RTFS
would indeed be highly advisable!  If it turns out that I am wrong, I wouldn't
mind a confirmation of this..

					Jordan