*BSD News Article 49540


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!news.kei.com!news.mathworks.com!fu-berlin.de!news.belwue.de!news
From: Markus Baeurle <s671687@rghx50.gp.fht-esslingen.de>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Why isn't NetBSD popular?
Date: 22 Aug 1995 13:59:13 GMT
Organization: Hochschule fuer Technik Esslingen
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <41cnrh$c9b@news.belwue.de>
References: <DDACyE.CBt@seas.ucla.edu> <VIXIE.95Aug14011302@wisdom.home.vix.com> <40nj98$8g2@news.belwue.de> <40rpge$fta@orion.cc.andrews.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: rghx51.gp.fht-esslingen.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (X11; I; HP-UX A.09.03 9000/715)
X-URL: news:40rpge$fta@orion.cc.andrews.edu
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:837 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:4935

gillham@andrews.edu (Andrew Gillham) wrote:
>Definitely true, _but_ the whole idea of NetBSD is free UN*X for "your"
>computer.  So, we're not just talking about the PC users.  While
>Microsoft has become wildly successful on marketing exclusively to the
>PC market (which _they_ built), NetBSD is not about making billions, but
>about running free software on the various computer bits you might have.

This is a very good approach and everyone should be as happy as I am that real
good, free operating systems exist at all. But this is still only available
for few people because there is as a very steep learning curve connected with
it.

>Hmm, I would tend to agree with you that the NetBSD install is not the
>greatest for a novice, but it does work.  My brother installed it
>without too much difficulty (Hi Greg!), and he doesn't have a "unix
>background."  Nevertheless, the instlal needs work, though I am fairly
>sure that someone is working on it.

Would be nice. Yes, it really does work. But you have to do several things by
hand which could be done automatically. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think
you have to calculate yourself how many cylinders you want for a certain
partition
although the computer has all the data necessary to do it for you so that you
would just have to say how many Meg you wanted.

>Basically in my ramble above, I was trying to point out that the OS is
>just the core of the whole "package", but you're comparing the NetBSD
>OS, with the FreeBSD "package" (sorry Jordan, I think you know what I
>mean).  Once a company starts selling NetBSD CDs, then you'll be seeing
>this "user-friendly" aspect that you are wanting.

Why can't there be as much of a package in it as possible? Just because of
a distinction between OS and programs that nobody will make? Who cares whether
a certain utility belongs to the OS or not? If many people need it, it can be
placed it the distribution in the first place - or at least be made
available easily.

>Also, I try to answer questions in the NetBSD newgroup, as I'm sure
>others do, but you're right, there is not that much traffic.

I will do the same as much as I can. I will also try to help Neil McRae with
the FAQ. Everybody should try to help him! Almost everybody found out something
interesting now and then which might be interesting for the FAQ!

MB