*BSD News Article 49135


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!fu-berlin.de!zrz.TU-Berlin.DE!zib-berlin.de!irz401!uriah.heep!bonnie.heep!not-for-mail
From: j@bonnie.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: More Questions Re: NFS install problem (2.0.5R)
Date: 23 Aug 1995 14:56:29 +0200
Organization: Private U**x site, Dresden.
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <41f8ht$612@bonnie.tcd-dresden.de>
References: <40ul40$n2i@muenchen.photogrammetrie.de> <413ftv$eic@agate.berkeley.edu> <419ocs$qhv@bonnie.tcd-dresden.de> <41cpmr$4pk@seattle.polstra.com>
Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.109.108.139
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> wrote:

(Use reserved port for NFS.)

>I'm curious ... why is this even an option?  Why not simply *always* use a
>privileged port for NFS during the install?  That should work with any
>NFS server.

Since the idea behind it is, ähem, braindead (and only used by Sun).
-- 
cheers, J"org                      private:   joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
                                   http://www.sax.de/~joerg/

Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)