Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!fcom.cc.utah.edu!cs.weber.edu!terry
From: terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C)
Subject: Re: [386BSD] cc1 fatal error & more!
Message-ID: <1992Sep11.151505.24561@fcom.cc.utah.edu>
Sender: news@fcom.cc.utah.edu
Organization: Weber State University (Ogden, UT)
References: <6703@vtserf.cc.vt.edu> <1992Sep11.012623.14965@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <BuEAx4.JIq@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 92 15:15:05 GMT
Lines: 25
In article <BuEAx4.JIq@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> rahnds@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Dale Rahn) writes:
>is it possible that the -O option of gcc uses too much memory
>(i have 8M real, 16M swap but have X386 running)
>or could there be a problem with gcc.
It depends on which X you are running. Is your server binary the 11 Meg or
the 1 Meg flavor?
Seriously, since you have the test bed all set up ;-), try not running X
and redoing the compile. I suspect that 24 Meg is too teeny to run the big
version of X and compile at the same time (considering the 11 Meg is the
size of the image without stack or locally allocated memory).
Terry Lambert
terry_lambert@gateway.novell.com
terry@icarus.weber.edu
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I have an 8 user poetic license" - me
Get the 386bsd FAQ from agate.berkeley.edu:/pub/386BSD/386bsd-0.1/unofficial
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------