*BSD News Article 4859


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve gnu.misc.discuss:6190 comp.org.eff.talk:9014 comp.unix.bsd:4907 comp.os.mach:2109 misc.int-property:496
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.org.eff.talk,comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.mach,misc.int-property,alt.suit.att-bsdi
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!constellation!unmvax!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!pipex!warwick!pavo.csi.cam.ac.uk!cam-cl!rwe11
From: rwe11@cl.cam.ac.uk (Richard Earnshaw)
Subject: Re: Are you sure UNIX is a trade mark?
Message-ID: <1992Sep11.084516.16908@infodev.cam.ac.uk>
Sender: news@infodev.cam.ac.uk (USENET news)
Nntp-Posting-Host: ely.cl.cam.ac.uk
Reply-To: rwe11@cl.cam.ac.uk (Richard Earnshaw)
Organization: U of Cambridge, England
References: <KANDALL.92Sep9170758@globalize.nsg.sgi.com> <farrow.716074432@fido.Colorado.EDU> <18ns8rINNd81@agate.berkeley.edu>
Distribution: inet
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 08:45:16 GMT
Lines: 40

In article <18ns8rINNd81@agate.berkeley.edu>, ag@cogsci.Berkeley.EDU
(Keith Gabryelski) writes:
	....
|> 
|> Pax, Keith
|> 
|> Ps:
|> 
|> When I four years old I used the words `Kleenex' and `Band-Aid' to
|> refer to generic products of their respected kind.  Neither company
|> paid much attention to my obviously wrong use of their trademarked
|> brand names.
|> 
|> Both companies still have trademark rights to the names (albeit
|> possibly on shakey ground).
|> 
|> I doubt USL needs to pay attention to singular illerates.
|> 
|> By the way: I don't speak for anyone but myself.

I was always under the impression that dilution of a trade mark came from
other companies being permitted to sell products using the same mark, if the
manufacturer of `Scotties' were to start calling their product `Kleenex'
and no action were taken then dilution would have occurred, but to say
"pass me a Kleenex" is not.  Similarly, many people I know call a vacuum
cleaner a Hoover; but, to the best of my knowledge Hoover is still a trade
mark of guess who...

The same applies to the brand name Unix; what you or I call it is pretty
irrelevant, so long as other companies don't try to market under the same
name.

Richard

-------------------------------------------
Richard Earnshaw
University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory
Pembroke Street
Cambridge  CB2 3QG
UK