Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!uunet!kithrup!sef From: sef@kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan) Subject: Re: 386bsd -- The New Newsgroup Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd. Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1992 20:37:31 GMT Message-ID: <1992Sep09.203731.3433@kithrup.COM> Keywords: newsgroup 386bsd news group References: <1992Sep8.154156.2672@resonex.com> <scs.716042844@wotan.iti.org> <1992Sep9.180831.3944@nntp.hut.fi> Lines: 19 In article <1992Sep9.180831.3944@nntp.hut.fi> jkp@cs.HUT.FI (Jyrki Kuoppala) writes: >>I would strongly suggest forming comp.unix.freebsd. The name more >>correctly indicates the purpose, and as appropriate variants emerge >>it can develop subgroups rationally. >comp.os.free.386bsd? Horrible name. In any event, I would suggest waiting about a month or so before any such discussions; by that time, the judge in the USL v BSDI and State of California suit should have returned, and made a decision on BSDI's motion for dismissal. At that point, whether or not a potentially short-lived group should exist can be discussed more fully. -- Sean Eric Fagan | "You can't get lost in one room, no matter how sef@kithrup.COM | little effort you make to learn your way around." -----------------+ -- William E Davidsen (william@crd.GE.COM) Any opinions expressed are my own, and generally unpopular with others.