Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!zombie.ncsc.mil!news.mathworks.com!fu-berlin.de!news.belwue.de!News.Uni-Marburg.DE!news.th-darmstadt.de!fauern!news.tu-chemnitz.de!irz401!uriah.heep!bonnie.heep!not-for-mail
From: j@bonnie.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Internet service providing-which OS?
Date: 24 Jul 1995 11:18:04 +0200
Organization: Private U**x site, Dresden.
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <3uvogc$a0t@bonnie.tcd-dresden.de>
References: <3ue5qa$ain@panix.com> <3uhstv$pf@empire.texas.net> <3ul4g2$i6n@bonnie.tcd-dresden.de> <3up143$4kt@crl.crl.com>
Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.109.108.139
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Gary E. Grant <ggrant@crl.com> wrote:
>In article <3ul4g2$i6n@bonnie.tcd-dresden.de>,
>J Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de> wrote:
>>currently only two show-stopper bugs that i know of, but that can be
>>worked around well. Unlike all other Unix machines in our office,
>>FreeBSD 1.1.5.1 does also survive the frightening "fork trap".
>>
>>Do you need more information? :-]
> How does the performance of Freebsd 1.1.5.1 compare to Freebsd 2.0.5 ?
>Gary :-)
I think 1.1.5.1 is still better. I've mainly noticed this on my
notebook where resources are scarce. I haven't felt any larger
difference on my desktop machine however.
Anyway, this will heavily depend on what you're doing.
--
cheers, J"org private: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)