Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!fu-berlin.de!zib-berlin.de!news.tu-chemnitz.de!irz401!uriah.heep!bonnie.heep!not-for-mail
From: j@bonnie.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Tape backups other than QIC-40/80?
Date: 20 Jul 1995 11:37:12 +0200
Organization: Private U**x site, Dresden.
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <3ul848$io5@bonnie.tcd-dresden.de>
References: <3ukkqv$7sr@nnrp4.primenet.com> <3ul81o$imu@bonnie.tcd-dresden.de>
Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.109.108.139
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
J Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de> wrote:
>Since even the QIC 40/80 support is in a rather ugly shape (and nobody
>seems to be pressed enough to be willing to support it -- hey you
>outside! this is a volunteer project! step forward if you think you
>can improve it), i hardly doubt.
p.s.: Apparently, (too) many people realized that SCSI tapes are _way_
more trustworthy.
--
cheers, J"org private: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)