Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!swidir.switch.ch!univ-lyon1.fr!ensta!itesec!sidhe.frmug.fr.net!keltia.frmug.fr.net!not-for-mail From: roberto@keltia.frmug.fr.net (Ollivier Robert) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: Which version of FreeBSD to run Date: 17 Jul 1995 23:59:50 +0200 Organization: A Happy FreeBSD 2.1-current Usenet Site Lines: 17 Message-ID: <3uemgm$jg@keltia.frmug.fr.net> References: <3u8sf3$e5d@is1.hk.super.net> Reply-To: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert) NNTP-Posting-Host: keltia.frmug.fr.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In article <3u8sf3$e5d@is1.hk.super.net>, Mr Eric Ho <eric@is1.hk.super.net> wrote: > I am considering setting up a FreeBSD machine in a production > environment to serve a few people. My question is which version should I > run (in terms of stability)? Any comment will be appreciated and thanks in > advance! For many things and people, 2.0.5-RELEASE is stable enough. My site feeds several UUCP sites for Email and News without problem since pre-2.0 versions. If you want top stability, it is difficult to beat 1.1.5.1. For me, there're too many nice things in the 2.* releases to go back to 1.*. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@freebsd.org -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- FreeBSD 2.x FAQ maintainer -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-