*BSD News Article 46831


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!zombie.ncsc.mil!news.duke.edu!agate!news.mindlink.net!vanbc.wimsey.com!io.org!nobody
From: taob@io.org (Brian Tao)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: WWW domain-name aliases on a single machine (Bind)?
Date: 15 Jul 1995 12:21:55 -0400
Organization: Internex Online (io.org) Data: 416-363-4151  Voice: 416-363-8676
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <3u8pv3$3ao@ionews.io.org>
References: <3tkhtd$6mk@news1.best.com> <3tp0t9$123@ionews.io.org> <87ivpbg7qu.fsf@interbev.mindspring.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: io.org

In article <87ivpbg7qu.fsf@interbev.mindspring.com>, Robert Sanders <rsanders@interbev.mindspring.com> wrote:
>On 9 Jul 1995 12:42:17 -0400, taob@io.org (Brian Tao) said:
>>     You *can* do it under Linux, but it's rather messy and requires
>> patches galore and replacement binaries.
>
>A single patch != patches galore, unless my definition of "galore" is
>way off.  You can also do it patchlessly with modload and dummy
>devices.

   Configuring dummy devices as additional binding IP addresses is
messy, compared to a simple "ifconfig alias".  Or you will need to
patch and recompile the Linux kernel, as well as replacing your
ifconfig and netstat binaries.
-- 
Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao
taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org