Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!oleane!jussieu.fr!ensta!itesec!sidhe.frmug.fr.net!keltia.frmug.fr.net!not-for-mail From: roberto@keltia.frmug.fr.net (Ollivier Robert) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc Subject: Re: 386BSD and FreeBSD Date: 8 Jul 1995 13:39:56 +0200 Organization: A Happy FreeBSD 2.1-current Usenet Site Lines: 13 Message-ID: <3tlqqc$3ti@keltia.frmug.fr.net> References: <3tare9$a0m@linux2.dlsu.edu.ph> Reply-To: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert) NNTP-Posting-Host: keltia.frmug.fr.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In article <3tare9$a0m@linux2.dlsu.edu.ph>, Humprey Sy <humprey@linux1.dlsu.edu.ph> wrote: > Is there any difference with respect to the design details with 386BSD from > FreeBSD or 4.xBSD? FreeBSD is 4.4BSD-lite based where 386BSD is, AFAIK, still Net2-based (i.e. post 4.3BSD). As for design details, FreeBSD is different from 386BSD, especially in respect to VM/cache design. FreeBSD has an unified VM/Cache buffer. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@freebsd.org -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- FreeBSD 2.x FAQ maintainer -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-