Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux.advocacy:10040 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:2608 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nexus.coast.net!news.kei.com!ddsw1!not-for-mail From: nesta@MCS.COM (Nesta Stubbs) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: BUGS in FreeBSD (Re: Linux vs. FreeBSD) Date: 23 Jun 1995 10:03:54 -0500 Organization: Angeli Caduti Lines: 21 Message-ID: <3sel4q$18o@Mars.mcs.com> References: <3qfhhv$7uc@titania.pps.pgh.pa.us> <3s8pvi$ma6@bonnie.tcd-dresden.de> <3saulb$j11@venus.mcs.com> <3sca3s$2g1@bonnie.tcd-dresden.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: mars.mcs.com In article <3sca3s$2g1@bonnie.tcd-dresden.de>, J Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de> wrote: >Nesta Stubbs <nesta@MCS.COM> wrote: > >>... Well one being that SLIP is not always over phone lines, >>two being that just because it IS over a phone line doesn't mean it >>should have a different "config" then the other network interfaces. > >The bug has been fixed < 24 hours after Nick's complaint appeared >in freebsd-hackers. > another reason why it's great to have the source code, kudos to the FreeBSD teams. >This has always been possible by killing the slattach process (which >is what you certainly want to do anyways). > True, but that introduces some discrepancies betwene interfaces that arent supposed to exist. -- To John Dillinger, and hope he is still alive. |Nesta Stubbs|