Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!Germany.EU.net!zib-berlin.de!news.tu-chemnitz.de!irz401!uriah.heep!not-for-mail From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: Linux vs. FreeBSD Date: 24 Jun 1995 23:26:15 +0200 Organization: Private FreeBSD site, Dresden. Lines: 14 Message-ID: <3shvtn$al4@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: <3qfhhv$7uc@titania.pps.pgh.pa.us> <3sd2ml$16e@pandora.sdsu.edu> <3sdm7m$fh@park.uvsc.edu> <3sfcvp$12n@pandora.sdsu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: uriah.heep.sax.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Larry Riedel <larryr@saturn.sdsu.edu> wrote: >Besides, if the signal to noise ratio (ie: the lack of crap like >this:) was better on the mailing list, then it would take MORE >time to read N messages in the mailing list, because there would >be fewer crap messages that could be skipped! You have to read a message, at least up to a certain point (like this :) until you know it's actually crap only (like this :-(). -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)