Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:475 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:1938 comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc:60 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!yoyo.aarnet.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!zombie.ncsc.mil!news.mathworks.com!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.dgsys.com!news From: eweiss@winchendon.dgsys.com Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc Subject: 386bsd versus LINUX Date: Tue, 06 Jun 95 11:28:51 PDT Organization: Digital Gateway Systems Lines: 10 Distribution: world Message-ID: <NEWTNews.5120.802463485.eric@winchendon.dgsys.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: winchendon.dgsys.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Newsreader: NEWTNews & Chameleon -- TCP/IP for MS Windows from NetManage Can anyone post a brief comparison of the different free Unix clones? The LINUX setup group seems filled with installation problems while the others are not. Is this because the others install better or because no one uses them? What about the availability of software for the various clones? Thanks. Eric