*BSD News Article 4449


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!comp.vuw.ac.nz!waikato.ac.nz!wupost.wustl.edu!ukma!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!emory!next.neuro.emory.edu
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: X386 and Diamond Stealth: not solution
Message-ID: <9460@emory.mathcs.emory.edu>
From: sb@next.neuro.emory.edu (Stephen O. Berger)
Date: 3 Sep 92 14:54:27 GMT
Reply-To: sb@next.neuro.emory.edu
Sender: news@mathcs.emory.edu
References: <Bu04w2.2u3@immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Lines: 22

> 
> I had just made up my mind to buy a Diamond Stealth when I heared about  
all
> this trouble. Well, I am looking for cards from other vendors now.
> So maybe you should give them a list of people who are _not_ going to  
buy a
> card from them, unless they change their policy.
> If you are doing so feel free to put my name on it.
> -- 
> Andreas Klingler
> asklingl@informatik.uni-erlangen.de
>        I'd love to help you out... Which way did you come in?


  I was just about to buy a Diamond Stealth also, but not now that
I've heard about diamond's uncooperative attitudes.  With the rate
that technology changes these days, you'd think that companies
couldn't afford these kinds of policies.



  Steve Berger (sb@onripx.neuro.emory.edu)