Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.protocols.nfs:11193 comp.protocols.kerberos:3838 comp.unix.admin:26843 comp.unix.bsd:16281 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!uwm.edu!news.alpha.net!news.mathworks.com!panix!not-for-mail From: mfagan@panix.com (Michael Fagan) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs,comp.protocols.kerberos,comp.unix.admin,comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: NFS security & interoperability Followup-To: alt.filesystems.afs Date: 27 Feb 1995 23:21:56 -0500 Organization: Public Access Internet & UNIX Lines: 23 Message-ID: <3iu8d4$qul@panix2.panix.com> References: <3isrt8$nn5@mudraker.mtholyoke.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: panix2.panix.com In article <3isrt8$nn5@mudraker.mtholyoke.edu>, Jurgen Botz <jbotz@mtholyoke.edu> wrote: >...stuff deleted... > >With AFS on the way out (at least Transarc is not porting it to >anything new, although I have heard that MIT is porting it to NetBSD) > ...stuff deleted... How did you come to this conclusion about AFS? There are plenty of people using AFS (or at least the smart ones are - okay, start flaming me :) and I don't think it is going away anytime soon. Seriously, I just came back from DECORUM and AFS is alive and well and IMHO it is the best choice today for a distributed file system. Later, -- -------------------- | Michael S. Fagan | | mfagan@panix.com | --------------------